They are not. And it is fallacious to say they are.
This is the first in a series of pieces I plan to write on the dangers of hidden premises and logical fallacies about Islam.
My education was a mishmash of a lot of things. To this date, my favorite subject remains to be logic. And my favorite logic lesson has been logical fallacies. They are everywhere and they determine a good part of how we reason. They define a good part of who we are.
It is wonderful to listen to a new person and hear their perspective on anything. You may not learn much about the subject matter, and that may be quite beside the point, but almost always you'll learn a lot about the people themselves.
As I listen to Western colleagues and friends making references to Islam, I am frequently amazed that they seem to be entertaining critical fallacies about Islam. I wonder whether Western policy makers share the same. If so, we need to do something about it. Otherwise, OK the sky may not fall, but we may well be further complicating the problem of religious extremism and terrorism that stems from it.
Here are the three fundamental fallacies that I've been able to grasp with some clarity so far.
1. Wahhabis are Sunnis
2. Reform in religion is a sure good thing
3. Emancipation of women will positively transform backward societies.
WAHHABIS ARE SUNNIS
My logic teacher would have probably called this a fallacy of generalization. Of course there are many arguments involved here and some of them may be touching on other fallacies. Fact remains this is a dangerous generalization.
Hidden assumption revealed: I'm assuming that the reader, the vast majority of Western policy makers, and an overwhelming majority of the Muslims worldwide are peaceful, peace-seeking moderates who have a vested interest in curbing and eventually eliminating religious extremism and terrorism for their own good. I'll be the first to admit: I'm after self-interest. I want peace for my own good.
The division between the Sunni and the Shia has political dimensions.
The Wahhabis are not Sunnis. They are a third, independent sect. They are split from both the Sunni and the Shia in fundamental religious ways. Suffice to say the real Wahhabi believes in his heart that many Sunni and Shia Muslims visiting holy places to pay respect to the dead can no longer qualify as Muslims. They become infidels according to the Wahhabi belief. This is a critical point to note and understand. In both Sunni and Shia Islam, people are obliged to make every effort to avoid calling someone a non-believer. It's one of the biggest sins to do so. This is one of the key areas where the Wahhabis split from not only the Shia but also from the Sunni.
This is an irreconcilable difference between Wahhabis and non-Wahhabis. And this difference forms the basis of today's takfiri terrorism. If we do not see the roots of takfiri terrorism in the Wahhabi belief, this will be a futile struggle. True, it is only a violent minority in Wahhabism that want to take their beliefs and put them into action on other Muslims and non-Muslims; however, we better recognize that Osama Bin Laden was produced by this conducive, fertile cultural basis.
So, the next president of the US, do please avoid calling Wahhabis as Sunnis. What you want to do is drive a wedge between the moderates and the extremists. You'll find the most moderate Muslims among the Sunnis. For from Delhi to Sarajevo, from Cairo to Kazan, Sunnis scholars for centuries preached it to be a religious duty to obey the authority even and especially under non-Muslim rule. War is a different thing. But if a country comes under the rule or even the occupation of a non-Muslim ruler, like Iraq today has, it is the religious obligation of the Sunni to obey the laws and instructions of the ruler. You, Mr/Madame next president, really want to tell all those Sunni Muslims that they could presumably not have anything to do with the OBL gang who belong to a freak side show within the magnificent history of Islam. Do please see how dangerous it is to equate extremist Wahhabism with Sunni beliefs. You don't want to push them closer together. You really want to split them.
Even in the case of Wahhabis, we need a full effort to divide the extremists from the moderates. Yes, it's all about Saudi Arabia, a country that is far from being a monolith. In today's Saudi Arabia, what matters is the clan you belong to. It's a gross and potentially vital error to tell Wahhabis that OBL is their product - even if that's true. At worst, we should try to put the blame squarely on one clan or another so that we win the hearts and minds of most of the rest.
So, Wahhabis are not Sunnis. And not all Wahhabis are the same. Even if we are not convinced of the accuracy of this conclusion, we must be wise enough to adopt it for its obvious utility.
In the next piece, I'd like to tackle the issue of reform in religion. There seems to be a common consensus in many Western and Islamic circles that some sort of Protestant-like reform in Islam will be a cure-all. I'd like to argue that let alone curing anything, such an attempt may well give more ammunition into the hands of the extremists while also potentially alienating the moderates.
Next: Hidden Premises on Islam (2): Reform in Religion or the Floodgates of Hell



